Improving the outcomes from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: interdisciplinary best practice guidelines

With increasing surgical specialisation and centralisation, some surgical emergencies can only be treated in specialist centres. In this context, guidelines for patient transfer from general to specialist hospitals can aid equity of patient access to emergency specialist surgical care. Guidelines have existed for some time on the early management and transfer of patients with head injury but for many surgical emergencies there have been no such guidelines. Consequently, publication of joint Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, College of Emergency Medicine and Royal College of Radiologists guidelines and audit standards on the diagnosis, early management and transfer of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) from general hospitals is welcome.1 If widely adopted, the guidelines will optimise patient care and have the potential to save lives. Unfortunately, guidelines have not existed for vascular emergencies such as rAAA. Data from Europe suggest that streamlined regional pathways do improve patient outcomes from rAAA.2 Interestingly, these guidelines were stimulated through research, when it became apparent during the IMPROVE (Immediate Management of the Patient with Ruptured aneurysm: Open Versus Endovascular repair) trial3 that practices to transfer patients with rAAA to a specialist centre varied widely across England. This led to a three-round Delphi consensus approach to examine the areas of consensus and disagreement concerning the transfer of patients with rAAA.4 RAAA is a lethal condition in which many patients die before they reach hospital. An appropriately trained vascular team including experienced vascular surgeons has the potential to improve outcomes of those reaching a vascular unit alive. This is dependent, in large part, on rapid diagnosis, appropriate early management and swift transfer. The diagnosis can be difficult, especially in the elderly with multiple co-morbidities. The development of a vascular surgical specialty, with its own specialist training, and the centralisation of vascular services in the UK will result in an increasing number of hospitals being unable to provide onsite operative intervention for rAAA. Consequently, increasing numbers of patients will have to be assessed locally by other specialists (many of whom will not have managed patients with rAAA), who will have to institute immediate care and consider which patients they should transfer to a specialist vascular centre. However, there are changes that might contribute to patient management. Emergency medicine trainees are now trained to perform abdominal ultrasonography to identify a number of key pathologies, including AAA. In the UK and elsewhere, patients have had variable quality of care, largely owing to inequality of access to specialist vascular surgical assessment and treatment when they present but also owing to an absence of standardisation of preoperative assessment and early management. General hospitals that operate on just a handful of patients with rAAA each year tend to have a higher mortality rate than that of specialist vascular centres.5,6 The elderly and women have been notably discriminated against.7,8 The Delphi consensus study on the transfer of patients from district general hospitals to vascular centres analysed ten areas of process of care from the diagnosis of rAAA through to the necessary conditions in the receiving hospital.4 The study demonstrated broad agreement about the type of patient who should be eligible for transfer but disagreements about patient management before and during transfer. Subsequently, in collaboration with the College of Emergency Medicine and others, the guidance document